I will address the Rose et al. paper using the Key question framework proposed by Kuper et al. :
I considered the sample used in the study to be appropriate in the sense that mental health service users (MHSU) were interviewed. Additionally that there was ample variation in the sample of MHSU w.r.t race and diagnosis. However I did have doubts regarding the necessity of including professionals as interviewees. Furthermore the selection process using care cordinators provoked doubt in my mind as those who have a closer relation to these coordinates (and therefore those who may be more likely to confide) may have been more likely to be selected.
I also felt the environment chosen for interview was questionable, using the setting where MHSU would (or would not) disclose about domestic violence, to discuss whether they would or wouldn't disclose information on domestic violence.
Also selecting only those known to be affected by domestic violence may exclude those unable to disclose domestic violence... ?
Additionally information was lacking, as is usual, in the detail of methods w.r.t. thematic analysis, making this harder to assess.
finally no mention of reflexivity was noted.