THOUGHTS SO FAR AND THREE QUESTIONS....

THOUGHTS SO FAR AND THREE QUESTIONS....

by Sara Shaw -
Number of replies: 2

Four really interesting posts so far... you've all chosen really interesting papers that already show how discourse analysis can be used to study diverse areas (from the advice-giving role of pharmacists and addiction to online gaming to the way nurses communicate about contraception and social influences on intimate relationships). Posts have also highlighted how discourse analysis is useful for studying communication and social interaction (e.g. between pharmacist and older patients). Also that interaction isn't always something between humans, but might be between e.g. gamer and computer. And that discourse analysis can help us to study the details of conversations through to bigger social influences (indeed, it often links them). So, lots covered already and it will be interesting to see what others post.

So far, posts have picked up on positive aspects of discourse analysis in enriching understanding of health and illness (which is fine) and particularly about how communication can shape different consultations, perhaps leading to misunderstandings on the part of patients (or clinicians). But is there anything that you have found tricky or frustrating about discourse analysis? Or about the specific papers that you have read? And how useful do you think discourse analysis studies are?

In reply to Sara Shaw

Re: THOUGHTS SO FAR AND THREE QUESTIONS....

by Deleted user -

I found the "debates about discursive reseach"-section in your paper very interesting.How can one actually find out whether findings in a discourse analysis are not just the reseachers' opinion? Does "evidence from other sources" mean similar results by other discourse analysis?

To be honest I find it very difficult to judge the credibility of a discourse analysis as I am not yet familiar with study design and  methodology of this kind of study!

In reply to Deleted user

Re: THOUGHTS SO FAR AND THREE QUESTIONS....

by Sara Shaw -

Interesting points here and in other postings about how complicated and time-consuming discourse analysis might be, about the potential value of qualitative research that focus on small samples (though some discourse analysis, like the paper on misunderstandings in consultations, does use large data sets) also whether discourse analysis is really just researchers' opinion.

These are important questions and one's we will keep coming back to in the module. So, what do others think?