14. Marking Criteria

14.1. Distinction

Distinction (70 and above)

A submission in the Distinction mark range shows mastery over the subject, is well structured and displays a clear and logical argument. It includes analysis informed by wider reading of relevant materials and a good grasp of detail. The submission should be complete, with few if any errors or omissions.

Indications of a Distinction-level submission include the following:

• A well-scoped and coherent topic

• Focused coverage of the issues, which are accurately and fully discussed

• Original thinking about the topic

• Sophisticated critical analysis

• Depth of insight into the theoretical issues

• Integration of a range of materials, including, where relevant, class and reading list materials

• Clarity of argument and expression, with a conclusion that follows logically from the analysis

• Complete, accurate and consistent citation

• Excellent use of written English with few, if any, grammatical or other errors

In addition to the above, Distinction answers to problem questions will also satisfy the following criteria:

• All relevant issues have been identified

• The analysis and the exposition and application of any relevant rules or principles is clear, accurate and comprehensive

• The application of any relevant legal rules and principles is insightful (e.g., the candidate demonstrates that s/he can both distinguish cases on their facts and argue by analogy)

• There is a conclusion that follows logically from the preceding analysis

To obtain a mark above the normal Distinction range (i.e., a mark of 80 or above), the submission should demonstrate exceptional qualities of originality, critical analysis and clarity of writing. In the case of an essay or dissertation, the writing and analysis should be at a level that generally would be found in an article accepted for publication with minor revisions.