Self-Access Unit · EAL7215

Climate Change & Academic Argumentation

A self-access online unit for B2 upper-intermediate learners of English for Academic Purposes. Work through Units 1–3 in order — about 60–90 minutes in total.

Level — CEFR B2 / IELTS 5.5–6.5
Tools — Video comprehension · Interactive reading & vocabulary · Consolidation quiz
Time — 60–90 minutes
Task 1 · Watch

What Earth in 2050 could look like

Watch this TED-Ed lesson once the whole way through, without pausing. It explains how different levels of carbon emissions could shape our planet over the next few decades.

TED-Ed, "What Earth in 2050 could look like" (dir. Sofia Pashaei, lesson by Shannon Odell), 5 min. Opens on YouTube if the embed doesn't load in your browser.

Task 2 · Check your understanding

Comprehension checkpoints

Answer in the order the ideas appear in the video. If you're unsure, watch the relevant section again before choosing.

Task 3 · Notice the language

Key phrases

These phrases from the video are useful for describing future possibilities in academic English. Match each one to its function by choosing the best option.

Task 1 · Read

Adapting to a warmer world

Read the passage once for general meaning before you look at the tasks below.

Cities across the world are beginning to treat climate adaptation as an urgent priority rather than a distant concern. Rotterdam, for example, has built floating neighbourhoods and water squares that fill during heavy rain and drain slowly afterwards, reducing pressure on the city's drainage network. Supporters argue that this kind of infrastructure investment is a rational response to a measurable risk: sea levels in the Netherlands have already risen by roughly twenty centimetres over the past century, and engineers expect this trend to continue.

Critics, however, note that adaptation projects are expensive and tend to benefit wealthier neighbourhoods first, since these are usually the areas where investment is concentrated. A further concern is that adaptation, on its own, does not address the underlying cause of the problem: rising global emissions. Even so, most urban planners maintain that adaptation and emissions reduction are not competing strategies but complementary ones, and that cities which delay adaptation now are likely to face far greater costs later.

This passage was written for this unit to model the claim → evidence → counter-argument → response pattern common in academic and opinion writing on climate topics.

Task 2 · Vocabulary in context

Fill the gaps

Complete each sentence with the correct word from the passage above. Type your answer and press Check.

Word bank: adaptationmeasurableconcentratedunderlyingcomplementarymaintain
Task 3 · Analyse the argument

Claim, evidence, or counter-argument?

Drag each sentence from the passage into the category that best describes its function in the argument.

Claim

Evidence

Counter-argument

Task 4 · Read the data

Global temperature anomaly, 1900–2020

This chart shows how far the global average surface temperature has been above or below the 1951–1980 average, in °C. Study it, then answer the questions.

Task 1 · Reconstruct

Dictogloss: rebuild the paragraph

Read the short paragraph below carefully twice. Then click "Hide text" and reconstruct it in your own words in the box, keeping the same meaning and as much of the key vocabulary as you can. There's no single correct answer — compare your version with the model afterwards.

Adaptation and mitigation are often presented as rival strategies, but most specialists regard them as two halves of the same response. Mitigation reduces the emissions that cause warming in the first place, while adaptation reduces the harm caused by the warming that is already unavoidable. A city that only mitigates is still exposed to today's risks; a city that only adapts is simply managing a problem that keeps getting worse.
Task 2 · Consolidation quiz

Check your progress

Five questions covering Units 1 and 2. You have two attempts per question.

Task 3 · Reflect

Reflection

In 2–3 sentences, write about how this unit's material relates to your own academic reading or writing.

Before you finish, check your response against this self-evaluation checklist: